White House Campaign Against State AI Legislation Gains Momentum in 2026
Key Takeaways
- The Trump administration AI regulation efforts have used three main tactics to discourage state AI laws: federal preemption attempts, an executive order directing agencies to challenge state regulations, and direct political pressure on Republican allies in states like Florida and Utah.
- Senator Marsha Blackburn released the first legislative text for a federal AI framework Congress could consider, a wide-ranging proposal that addresses consumer safety, children's protections, platform liability, and intellectual property rights. The bill would need to overcome significant political hurdles to pass both chambers.
- White House AI executive order threats to withhold federal broadband funding influenced Virginia lawmakers to hold back on AI legislation this session, though the Commerce Department missed its 90-day deadline to formally identify which state AI laws it considers "onerous."
- In 2026, state AI legislation continues trending upward despite federal opposition, with lawmakers in both parties introducing bills on everything from study committees to substantive regulations on AI developers and deployers.
- Only federal preemption enacted by Congress can fully stop the growth of state AI laws, and until that happens, states will continue filling the policy vacuum on this issue.
- If you're a subscriber, click here for the full edition of this update. Or, click here to learn more about our MultiState.ai+ subscription.
We're finally seeing legislative language on a federal AI regulatory framework, and we expect that debate to heat up this summer. But as another set of state legislative sessions winds down, how has federal opposition to state-level AI regulation actually affected the debate this year?
The states have now debated thousands of bills related to AI and have enacted hundreds of their own AI laws. As we’ve chronicled, most of those laws are not very substantive (e.g., study committees, school curriculum guidelines) or contain no mandates on developers or deployers of AI models. But each legislative session in the states becomes more focused on the substantive portions of AI policy, and without federal action, the states are always happy to fill the policy vacuum. That’s especially true on a topic as high-profile, impactful, and controversial as AI. President Trump’s administration has made it very clear that they do not want to see state-level AI regulations and have taken three concrete steps to quash current and future state-level AI laws: federal preemption, executive orders, and political pressure.
If you're a subscriber, click here for the full edition of this update. Or, click here to learn more about our MultiState.ai+ subscription.
